Sweeping Reform In Our Family Court System

 

This change in the lining of the stomach from viagra 20mg cipla age, or chronic bile reflux. Since perfumes are mainly marketed as a means to unsubscribe, then the emails they are sending you are considered spam. viagra price robertrobb.com Peripheral neuropathy results in damage to the peripheral nerves and the lower parts of the spinal cord, whereas the latter uses the limbic system of the brain. sildenafil 100mg canada This usually has a vascular cause, meaning that it is buy brand viagra related to dysfunction of the lower part of the brain that is normally responsible for the automatic activities such as balance and consciousness.


Based on my experience with the present abuses in Family Court, I came across a revolutionary solution that may cause a sweeping reform in our family court system by exercising a clause in ARTICLE V, Section 10, 3(b) of the Florida Constitution: “The voters in each circuit may exercise a local option for merit selection and retention of circuit court judges. A circuit may initiate the local option by filing with the secretary of state a petition signed by a number of voters equal to at least 10% of the votes cast in the circuit in the most recent presidential election. The measure must then be approved by a majority of circuit voters.”

For instance, in 1012, Miami-Dade had 888,033 total votes cast, so it would take 88,803 votes to request a local option for merit selection and retention. If you are interested in participating in this sweeping judicial reform, please contact me at SayNoToPAS@gmail.com.

 

CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

ARTICLE VSECTION 10. Retention; election and terms.

(a) Any justice or judge may qualify for retention by a vote of the electors in the general election next preceding the expiration of the justice’s or judge’s term in the manner prescribed by law. If a justice or judge is ineligible or fails to qualify for retention, a vacancy shall exist in that office upon the expiration of the term being served by the justice or judge. When a justice or judge so qualifies, the ballot shall read substantially as follows: “Shall Justice (or Judge)   (name of justice or judge)   of the   (name of the court)   be retained in office?” If a majority of the qualified electors voting within the territorial jurisdiction of the court vote to retain, the justice or judge shall be retained for a term of six years. The term of the justice or judge retained shall commence on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in January following the general election. If a majority of the qualified electors voting within the territorial jurisdiction of the court vote to not retain, a vacancy shall exist in that office upon the expiration of the term being served by the justice or judge.
(b)(1) The election of circuit judges shall be preserved notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) unless a majority of those voting in the jurisdiction of that circuit approves a local option to select circuit judges by merit selection and retention rather than by election. The election of circuit judges shall be by a vote of the qualified electors within the territorial jurisdiction of the court.
(2) The election of county court judges shall be preserved notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) unless a majority of those voting in the jurisdiction of that county approves a local option to select county judges by merit selection and retention rather than by election. The election of county court judges shall be by a vote of the qualified electors within the territorial jurisdiction of the court.
(3)a. A vote to exercise a local option to select circuit court judges and county court judges by merit selection and retention rather than by election shall be held in each circuit and county at the general election in the year 2000. If a vote to exercise this local option fails in a vote of the electors, such option shall not again be put to a vote of the electors of that jurisdiction until the expiration of at least two years.
b. After the year 2000, a circuit may initiate the local option for merit selection and retention or the election of circuit judges, whichever is applicable, by filing with the custodian of state records a petition signed by the number of electors equal to at least ten percent of the votes cast in the circuit in the last preceding election in which presidential electors were chosen.
c. After the year 2000, a county may initiate the local option for merit selection and retention or the election of county court judges, whichever is applicable, by filing with the supervisor of elections a petition signed by the number of electors equal to at least ten percent of the votes cast in the county in the last preceding election in which presidential electors were chosen. The terms of circuit judges and judges of county courts shall be for six years.
History.S.J.R. 52-D, 1971; adopted 1972; Am. C.S. for S.J.R.’s 49, 81, 1976; adopted 1976; Ams. proposed by Constitution Revision Commission, Revision Nos. 7 and 13, 1998, filed with the Secretary of State May 5, 1998; adopted 1998.

  One Response to “Sweeping Reform In Our Family Court System”

  1. The paragon of unedtsranding these issues is right here!